Advises and represents clients in administrative and judicial proceedings
Dr Maciej Kiełbowski advises in numerous cases before administrative authorities and the administrative courts. He handles a range of judicial proceedings at all stages of the dispute, from analysis of the grounds for claims and pre-litigation measures, through obtaining interim relief and conducting the trial, to enforcement of the judgment. He also seeks constitutional review in proceedings before the Constitutional Tribunal.
He works on a number of judicial cases connected with projects in the renewable energy sector, involving such issues as land rights and unfair competition. He has participated in litigation connected with cross-border bankruptcy under the EU’s Insolvency Regulation (1346/2000), infrastructure projects for the Euro 2012 football championship, recognition of domestic and foreign arbitration awards, and claims for damages.
He advises on an ongoing basis in administrative matters and administrative court proceedings related to major construction and infrastructure projects, as well as proceedings involving the rail market.
He has experience conducting litigation for clients from the banking sector, connected for example with acquisition of real estate as well as intermediation in performance of banking activities in commercial dealings on behalf of banks.
He joined Wardyński & Partners in 2009.
Faculty of Law and Administration, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań: bachelor’s (administration); master’s (law); doctorate, Department of Administrative Procedure and Administrative Court Procedure, dissertation entitled “The binding effect of a Constitutional Tribunal interpretational ruling upon an administrative court”
Wielkopolska Bar Chamber, Poznań
“Direct application of the Constitution by the general courts and administrative courts” (co-author), 2019 Yearbook
“Disputes over EU funding and competitions: A procedural minefield” (co-author), 2019 Yearbook
“Will administrative offices really work faster and more efficiently?”, 2018 Yearbook
“You can—and should—demand that your case be resolved” (co-author), 2017 Yearbook
R. Hauser et al. (ed.), Pleadings and rulings In administrative court cases with explanations and CD (co-author), C.H. Beck (1st ed. 2014, 2nd ed. 2016)
P. Szustakiewicz (ed.), Access to public information (co-author), C.H. Beck (1st ed. 2014, 2nd ed. 2016)
Note on Supreme Administrative Court judgment of 26 April 2016, Case I OSK 3095/15, Palestra 11/2016
“Refusal to apply a statute as a manifestation of lawmaking activity of the administrative courts,” in T. Bąkowski & J.P. Tarno (ed.), Lawmaking of the administrative courts, Wolters Kluwer Polska 2015
Note on resolution of seven-judge panel of the Supreme Administrative Court of 18 December 2013, Case I OPS 13/13, Palestra 7–8/2014
“Allegation of violation of constitutional provisions and refusal to apply a regulation by an administrative court in commercial cases,” Radca Prawny 3/2014
“Direct application of the Constitution by administrative courts in commercial cases,” in A. Kisielewicz & J.P. Tarno (ed.), Judicial review of the administration in commercial cases, Wolters Kluwer Polska 2013
M. Kiełbowski in W. Piątek (ed.), “Review of case law: Administrative law,” Forum Prawnicze 5/2013 (report on resolution of seven-judge panel of the Supreme Administrative Court of 3 September 2013, Case OPS 2/13)
M. Kiełbowski in W. Piątek (ed.), “Review of case law: Administrative law,” Forum Prawnicze 3/2013 (report on resolution of seven-judge panel of the Supreme Administrative Court of 25 March 2013, Case II GPS 1/13)
“Direct application of the Polish Constitution by an administrative court in commercial cases,” Radca Prawny 3/2013
“Electronic filing of court papers,” Kadra Kierownicza w Administracji 12/2012
“Saturday and problems with calculating periods,” Kadra Kierownicza w Administracji 11/2012
“Authorisation to issue decisions,” Kadra Kierownicza w Administracji 8/2012
“Certificates not in all cases,” Kadra Kierownicza w Administracji 7/2012
“Grounds for issuance of a vacating decision,” Kadra Kierownicza w Administracji 4/2012
“The authority does not always file an appeal,” Kadra Kierownicza w Administracji 2/2012
“Legal consequences of filing an electronic application,” Kadra Kierownicza w Administracji 12/2011
“Objections to the justification of a judgment by the province administrative court” (note on resolution of seven-judge panel of the Supreme Administrative Court of 15 February 2010, Case II FPS 8/09), Przegląd Podatkowy 11/2011
“When a deadline falls on a Saturday,” Kadra Kierownicza w Administracji 11/2011
“A judgment as public information,” Monitor Prawniczy 24/2010
“Refund of improperly collected excise tax” (note on resolution of seven-judge panel of the Supreme Administrative Court of 13 July 2009, Case I FPS 4/09), Przegląd Podatkowy 5/2010